| HOME WISE Uranium Project > Mining & Milling > Industry > |

(last updated 12 Jul 2010)
> for old mines, see Decommissioning Data - Canada
| GENERAL INFORMATION |
Mineral and Commodity Review: Uranium
(Natural Resources Canada)
Canadian Uranium Fact Sheet
(Natural Resources Canada)
| YUKON |
| NORTHWEST TERRITORIES & NUNAVUT |








| Aug. 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 7430 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.034% U | ||||
| BRITISH COLUMBIA |

| 1979 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 4,010 t U | 6 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.21% U | 0.14% U | |||


| ALBERTA |

| SASKATCHEWAN |

| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 231 t U | 7,962 t U | 4,000 t U | 346 t U | |
| Ore grade: | 0.64% U | 0.75% U | 0.50% U | 0.31% U | |
[ISSUES] · [MORE ISSUES] ·
[DETAILS (CAMECO)] ![]()
Mineral Deposit Info:
Rabbit Lake
·
Collins Bay A
/
B, D, E, F
·
Eagle Point
/
North
/
South ![]()
The mill is scheduled for a one-year temporary shutdown in the first quarter of 2001. In 2002, the mill will continue operation and process the residual ore from the Eagle Point deposit and 57% of the Cigar Lake ore.
Rabbit Lake Joint Venture


The ore deposits are mined out; the mill is processing ore from the McArthur River mine.

[ISSUES] · [MORE ISSUES] · [DETAILS: COGEMA RES.
]
Mineral Deposit Info: Cluff Lake D
·
OP Deposit
·
Dominique-Janine North/ Ext.
·
Dominique-Peter

| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 28,342 t U | 52,147 t U | 148 t U | 311 t U | 51,357 t U |
| Ore grade: | 21.7% U | 12.2% U | 1.8% U | 2.0% U | 10.7% U |
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES] · [DETAILS: CAMECO
· COGEMA RES.
]
Mineral Deposit Info:
Cigar Lake ![]()
57% of the Cigar Lake ore is to be milled at the Rabbit Lake mill. The remainder is to be milled at McClean Lake.
Cigar Lake Mining Corp - CLMC

| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 4,962 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 1.43% U | ||||
Dawn Lake joint venture

| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 6,885 t U | 385 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 3.75% U | 0.86% U | |||
Dawn Lake joint venture

| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 66,442 t U | 62,510 t U | 8,819 t U | 2,830 t U | 61,317 t U |
| Ore grade: | 13.3% U | 22.3% U | 5.4% U | 7.1% U | 10.1% U |
Aerial view: Google Maps
[ISSUES] · [OLDER ISSUES]
Mineral Deposit Info:
McArthur River ![]()
The ore from the McArthur River mine is processed at the Key Lake mill.
McArthur River joint venture


| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 1,031 t U | 4,115 t U | 1,785 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.68% U | 2.1% U | 1.5% U | ||
McClean North Deposit
| Mar. 6, 2007 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 4,415 t U | 21 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 2.4% U | 0.63% U | |||
Mineral Deposit Info:
JEB
·
McClean North
/
South
/
Sue
/ Caribou
Aerial view: Google Maps
[ISSUES] · [OLDER ISSUES] · [DETAILS: COGEMA RES.
]
The mill is to process the Midwest ore and 43% of the Cigar Lake ore.
McClean Lake joint venture

| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 16,340 t U | 1,662 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 1.5% U | 18.1% U | |||
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES] · [DETAILS: COGEMA RES.
]
The ore is to be milled at McClean Lake.
| Reserves | Resources | ||||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 2,200 t U | 1,700 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.48% U | 18.0% U | |||
Midwest Joint Venture

| Roughrider Zone Nov. 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 2531 t U | 2104 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 2.18% U | 2.54% U | |||
> Download Technical Report Dec. 18, 2009 (3.6MB PDF)
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report Sep. 4, 2009 (2.1M PDF)
(SEDAR)

| End 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 18,002 t U | 3,731 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 3.84% U | 1.74% U | |||
[ISSUES]
Cree Extension Joint Venture

Aerial view: Google Maps
| May 26, 2010 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 24,450 t U | 9,435 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 1.31% U | 0.88% U | |||
> Download Technical Report July 8, 2010 (8.1M PDF)
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report April 3, 2009 (8.5M PDF)
(SEDAR)







| Feb. 2010 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 574 t U | 607 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.80% U | 0.71% U | |||
> Download Technical Report Feb. 24, 2010 (12.4MB)
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report Sep. 4, 2009 (13.7 MB)
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report Feb. 17, 2009 (10.4MB)
(SEDAR)
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
| July 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 9,395 t U | 458 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.13% U | 0.10% U | |||
> Download Technical Report Sep. 4, 2009 (13.7 MB)
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report Nov. 12, 2008
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report Nov. 13, 2008
(SEDAR)
> Download
Technical Report Feb. 17, 2009 (10.4MB)
(SEDAR)
| July 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 5,978 t U | 876 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.062% U | 0.057% U | |||
> Download Technical Report Sep. 4, 2009 (13.7 MB)
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report Feb. 17, 2009 (10.4MB)
(SEDAR)














| MANITOBA |
| ONTARIO |


> Download Technical Report, June 29, 2007
(5.1M PDF)

| Oct. 4, 2007 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 2,458 t U | 13,904 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.043% U | 0.037% U | |||
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES]
| QUEBEC |



| Mar. 2, 2010 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 1,504 t U | 3,562 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.38% U | 0.47% U | |||
> Download Technical Report Apr. 16, 2010 (2.9M PDF)
(SEDAR)

[ISSUES]

| Sep. 1, 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 2,868 t U | 4,914 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.66% U | 0.42% U | |||
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES]


| May 10, 2010 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 8,917 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.011% U | ||||
> Download Technical Report June 24, 2010 (17.4M PDF)
(SEDAR)
> Download Technical Report Aug. 21, 2008 (45.2M PDF)
(SEDAR)

| NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR |

| Reserves | Resources | ||||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 1,888 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.037% U | ||||
> Download Technical Report Sep. 30 2009 (7.6M PDF)
(SEDAR)


| Feb. 25, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Michelin Lake, underground | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size: | 1,273 t U | 17,147 t U | 12,941 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.10% U | 0.11% U | 0.10% U | ||
| Michelin Lake, open pit | |||||
| Size: | 3,757 t U | 3,759 t U | 699 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.068% U | 0.051% U | 0.042% U | ||
| Jacques Lake, underground | |||||
| Size: | 308 t U | 2,254 t U | 1,768 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.076% U | 0.068% U | 0.068% U | ||
| Jacques Lake, open pit | |||||
| Size: | 307 t U | 1,135 t U | 890 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.076% U | 0.059% U | 0.042% U | ||
| Rainbow | |||||
| Size: | 654 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.068% U | ||||
| Nash | |||||
| Size: | 348 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.059% U | ||||
| Inda | |||||
| Size: | 1,745 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.059% U | ||||
| Gear | |||||
| Size: | 101 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.051% U | ||||
[ISSUES]
Central Mineral Belt (CMB) Joint Venture


Central Mineral Belt (CMB) Joint Venture

| Upper C-Zone Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 1,973 t U | 1,092 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.029% U | 0.020% U | |||
| Lower C-Zone Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 615 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.042% U | ||||
| Area 1 / Trout Pond Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 185 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.047% U | ||||
| Armstrong Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 346 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.035% U | ||||
> Download Technical Report July 31, 2008 (12.2M PDF)
·
Technical Report Sep. 7, 2007 (6.7M PDF)
(SEDAR)

| April 29, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 896 t U | 1,435 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.049% U | 0.045% U | |||
> Download Technical Report June 12, 2008 (2.6M PDF)
(SEDAR)
| NEW BRUNSWICK |
| NOVA SCOTIA |
| HOME WISE Uranium Project > Mining & Milling > Industry > |