Current Issues: Operating Nuclear Fuel Plants - France
(last updated 10 Feb 2024)
> See also Current Issues for
> See also:
INB No. 151
Information about Marcoule plant (Nuclear Safety Authority - ASN, in French)
Emergency exercise at Mélox MOX fuel fabrication plant reveals serious deficiencies
"The inspection of the Mélox facility (INB 151) from December 19 to 20, 2022 focused on the theme of "Emergency situation management" and was carried out at night, unannounced.
The inspectors arrived around 10:00 p.m. at the site reception to carry out a simulation, outside normal hours (HHN), in order to test the implementation of the operator's first actions in the event of an emergency situation and to assess the effectiveness of the rigging of the local management command post (PCD-L), consisting of several cells.
The scenario, launched around 10:30 p.m., consisted of simulating the crash of an airplane on the nuclear building 501 and strongly impacting the administrative building 502 and the normal access to the site. The unavailability of the normal crisis management premises, in building 502, led to the rigging of the crisis organization in the backup command post, located in building 506.
Dysfunctions in the alert, in particular of the authorities (prefects and ASN), were noted, mainly with too late information of the ASN, more than an hour and a half after the triggering of the scenario, and an absence of formalization of the alert to the prefect of Gard and no alert of the prefect of Vaucluse.
In addition, the work in progress in the fallback CP [command post], without the implementation of compensatory measures, made crisis management difficult to operate.
This is unsatisfactory and requires immediate corrective action.
Difficulties were also noted on the automaton used to alert PUI [internal emergency plan] on-call duty. The alert had to be carried out by calls launched manually. Finally, the documentation available in the backup PC was not up to date. This had already been noted during an inspection carried out in 2018. [...]" [emphasis added]
> Download: Inspection nº INSSN-MRS-2022-0632 , ASN, Dec. 22, 2022 (PDF - in French)
French nuclear regulator acknowleges that nuclear fuel "cycle" is a phantom, requests worst case analysis in view of spent fuel storage congestion problems
> View here
Production difficulties at MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant necessitate construction of new depleted UO2 production facility at Malvési
[...] "since 2015, the [MELOX] plant has experienced a number of malfunctions and has serious production problems," said Igor Le Bars, director of safety expertise at the Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) to Reporterre. Clearly, Melox produces a lot more failed Mox pellets - scrap - than expected.
Orano associates these problems with a change of ingredient in its recipe. To make Mox, you have to combine depleted uranium oxide (UO2) and plutonium oxide (PuO2). The depleted uranium came from a facility based in Pierrelatte (Drôme) which manufactured according to the "wet process", but closed following an "inconclusive ten-year review". The new powder comes from another Orano facility, located in Lingen, Germany. There, UO2 is obtained using the "dry route" process [2]. However, the German ingredient posed a problem: the powder does not have the same particle size as the wet process. The grains, which are much finer, disperse more easily and cause all sorts of problems. "The most important thing is the finesse and homogeneity of the mixture, you must not find any 'lumps', i.e. clusters of plutonium", explains Igor Le Bars. During the making of the Mox, we also add some additives, a lubricant (to butter the mold of the pastille, in a way) but also a kind of yeast which will be used to "aerate" the mixture.
Solidity, texture… the pellets are therefore of different natures. To remedy the problem, Orano has returned to the wet process by testing another powder, this time from Sweden (American Westinghouse factory), whose qualification is expected for 2022. At the same time, the manufacturer is building a new workshop on its historic site in Malvési (Aude) to produce its powder using the same process, but in France. Investment cost: 70 million euros.
(Reporterre May 2, 2022)
France's nuclear operators in desperate search for solution to congestion problem at La Hague reprocessing plant caused by production difficulties at MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant
The Melox plant is still experiencing great difficulties in producing MOX fuel for EDF's reactors with the quality and in the quantities expected. These difficulties lead to the production of a significant quantity of radioactive materials containing plutonium, qualified as "MOX scrap", which is then stored in the La Hague plant.
In the very short term, Orano has therefore indicated its urgent need for an extension of this storage capacity for plutonium-bearing materials at La Hague, to allow the continuation of fuel reprocessing. In the absence of such an increase in storage capacity, a downward adjustment in processing would be necessary, which would accelerate the congestion of the spent fuel storage pools.[...]
At the request of the ASN, the operators interviewed developed and presented various prospective scenarios, based on several sets of hypotheses, with varying degrees of pessimism [!] concerning the proper functioning of the various "fuel cycle" plants. [...]
EDF plans to build a centralized storage pool at the La Hague site for the storage of fuels that are not to be processed in the short or medium term. However, this project is behind schedule and will not be available before 2034. [...]
Noting that the scenarios studied lead to a possible saturation of spent fuel storage before 2030, the operators gave an update on the progress of the following projects, which constitute countermeasures to the delay of the centralized storage pool:
- densification of the storage pools at La Hague;
- development of a dry storage concept
- increasing the use of MOX fuel in reactors.
(ASN Mar. 1, 2022)
Production difficulties at MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant lead to Nuclear Safety Authority considering abandoning the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel altogether
For the first time, to the knowledge of Reporterre, a nuclear manager in France is openly considering the end of the reprocessing of spent fuel at La Hague (Manche). On Wednesday January 19, during his back-to-school video press conference, Bernard Doroszczuk, director of the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN), said that we had to think about this option: "It will be necessary either to provide for the renovation of the current installations if reprocessing is continued; or anticipate the implementation of alternative solutions for the management of spent fuel, which should be available by 2040, if reprocessing is stopped."
Why this new proposal? Because, explained the ASN director, "a series of events weakens the entire fuel cycle chain" and several of its links are clogged:
- the pool at the La Hague plant (Manche), in which the spent fuel is currently stored, is reaching saturation;
- Orano's Melox plant, in which part of the plutonium is recycled to make fuel, called Mox, works very poorly: "We have too many breakdowns. Last year, we produced between 50 and 60 tons while the order book shows 120 tons per year," said Régis Faure, spokesperson for the Orano Melox site, to Usine Nouvelle. Thus, the plutonium accumulates at the entrance, while at the exit, explained Mr. Doroszczuk, "these problems that Orano has not mastered lead to the disposal of waste that contains more plutonium than expected." ;
- finally, revealed the ASN director, "the faster-than-expected corrosion of the evaporators at the Orano La Hague plant weakens the reprocessing capacities".
He therefore recommends anticipating the crisis, and either choosing to continue the reprocessing or to stop it. In both cases, this will involve very substantial investments, which we must think about now.
(Reporterre Jan. 19, 2022)
Orano injects 84 million euros into MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant to reduce production outages
Mox fuel specialist Orano Melox is putting 84 million euros on the table between now and 2025 to improve plant maintenance and team training at the Marcoule site in Chusclan (Gard). The aim is to increase production from less than 60 tonnes to 100, then 120, tonnes per year.
(Usine Nouvelle Jan. 13, 2022)
Production difficulties at MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant lead to congestion at La Hague reprocessing plant
On 28 September 2021, the ASN college interviewed Mr. Knoche, director general of Orano.
The hearing first allowed an assessment of the worsening difficulties that the operator of the Melox plant is facing in the manufacture of MOX fuel. These difficulties have two types of consequences:
- they lead to the production of a significant quantity of radioactive materials containing plutonium, qualified as "MOX scrap", which is then stored in the La Hague plant, either in the form of powder or in the form of fuel assemblies
- the reduced MOX production capacity leads to a reduction in reprocessing, which accelerates the congestion of storage pools for spent fuel assemblies [at La Hague].
(ASN Oct. 25, 2021)
Violation of criticality rules at MELOX MOX fuel plant
On Feb. 26, 2021, a sample of pellets was transferred from one glovebox to another, without keeping track of it. After checking, it was found that the safety limits of the workstation had not been exceeded.
The event had no consequences for personnel or the environment.
Orano proposed to rate the event Level 1 on the INES scale.
(Orano Mar. 3, 2021)
Orano applies for license to export equipment left over from canceled U.S. MOX fuel plant to MELOX fuel plant in France
> View here
Five significant events declared at Orano's Melox MOX nuclear fuel plant in 2019
- Aug. 17, 2019: Contamination of a workshop with depleted uranium oxide
- Sep. 16, 2019: Contamination of a workshop during a maintenance operation
- Sep. 17, 2019: Containment breach during maintenance and normal operations at
Powder sector
- Nov. 1, 2019: Contamination of a room during waste removal
- Nov. 16, 2019: Containment breach in the Powder sector
All of these events were rated Level 0 on the INES scale.
> Download: Rapport d'information du site Orano Melox 2019 (4.1MB PDF - in French)
Technician receives radiation overdose at Orano's Melox MOX nuclear fuel plant
On February 11, a monitoring sensor triggered an alarm while a technician was performing a glove box handling operation in a workshop at the Orano Melox plant. The operator immediately donned the appropriate mask and evacuated the work room.
[...] the evaluation carried out by the French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) shows that the dose received by the technician would exceed the regulatory annual limit.
The study conducted subsequent to this incident showed that the glove used at the workstation had been perforated.
Orano Melox has proposed to classify this incident as level 2 on the INES scale.
(Orano June 24, 2020)
Difficulties in manufacture of MOX fuel again lead to significant nuclear safety event in all 22 reactors of 900 MWe using this fuel
EDF has reclassified to level 1 of the INES scale a significant nuclear safety event relating to the combination of two anomalies affecting the fuel based on mixed uranium and plutonium oxide (MOX) from certain 900 MWe nuclear reactors:
- the potential presence, in MOX fuel pellets, of plutoniferous particles of sizes larger than the usual specifications;
- a phenomenon of rising neutron flux at the lower and upper ends of the MOX fuel assemblies more significant than anticipated.
The combination of these two anomalies calls into question the demonstration of the integrity of the fuel during certain infrequent incident situations. This significant event concerns all 22 reactors of 900 MWe using MOX fuel [1].
This significant event, which was initially classified as level 0 on the INES scale in 2017, led EDF to implement operating compensation measures on the reactors concerned as well as modifications in the MOX fuel production line.
The occurrence of new difficulties in 2019 during the manufacture of MOX fuel shows that the corrective actions implemented still do not exclude the occasional presence of plutoniferous particles of sizes larger than the usual specifications. Additional corrective actions have therefore been implemented in order to reduce their occurrence.
In addition, EDF identified in 2019 that the higher than expected neutron flux rise concerns not only the bottom of the assembly, as was highlighted in 2017, but also the top. EDF has therefore defined additional operating compensation measures.
Given the timeframe for implementing all of the compensatory measures and first measures which have proven ineffective, the event was reclassified in November 2019 to level 1 of the INES scale for all 900 reactors MWe using MOX fuel.
[1] These are the reactors of the Saint-Laurent-des-Eaux, Tricastin, Gravelines, Chinon B, Dampierre nuclear power plants and reactors 1 and 2 of the Blayais nuclear power plant.
(ASN Dec. 24, 2019)
Violation of criticality rules at MELOX MOX fuel plant
On June 25, 2017, the amount of plutonium found in a waste container showed a "significant exceedance" of the permitted limit.
(ASN July 13, 2017)
Areva commissions second line for mixture of powders at Melox MOX fuel plant
Areva's MOX fuel fabrication plant MELOX in Marcoule strengthens its production capacity with the commissioning of a second powder mixing line. The mixture of powders is the first step in the manufacture of MOX fuel process.
The Areva MELOX plant produced 134 tonnes of MOX fuel in 2014.
(Areva Oct. 7, 2015)
Violation of criticality rules at MELOX MOX fuel plant
On Nov. 25, 2014, Areva announced that on Nov. 22 some equipment containing lubricant was introduced into a glove box without the required listing.
Areva proposed to rate the event level 1 on the INES scale.
Unidentified drone overflights observed at MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant site in Marcoule
A drone overflight was observed during the night between Thursday (Nov. 6) and Friday (Nov. 7) at the nuclear site of Marcoule. Since early October, 15 overflights have been observed at various nuclear plants in France already. It is still unknown, who is responsible for them and what their intentions are.
(Midi Libre Nov. 7, 2014)
Another drone overflight has been observed at the Marcoule site last night.
(Objectif Gard Nov. 19, 2014)
ASN makes further operation of MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant conditional upon safety improvements
On July 31, 2014, the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) ordered the improvement of several safety-related issues for the MELOX plant to be allowed to continue operation. The issues include radiation exposure of employees, fire protection, and protection against criticality events, among others.
Depleted uranium required for MOX fuel fabrication at MELOX plant to be imported from USA
Areva Inc. has applied for an NRC export licence for up to 100 t of depleted UO2 powder per year from its Richland, Washington, nuclear fuel plant to Marcoule:
"AREVA's MELOX facility near Avignon, France produces mixed-oxide LWR fuel for power reactor customers. The 'burnable' part of this MOX fuel is plutonium oxide, which is supplied to MELOX from AREVA's spent fuel recycling facility in France. The Pu oxide makes up at maximum just 10% of the weight of the MOX fuel pellet. Depleted uranium is used as a diluent, making up the remaining 90+% of the fuel pellets. Around 2011 MELOX switched its supplier of U-oxide powder to AREVA's Lingen, Germany fuel fabrication facility. The previous supplier in France has ceased operation. For various reasons, AREVA is now looking at several different alternatives for supply of U-oxide for MELOX. AREVA's Richland facility has been specifically asked to develop alternative types of U-oxide powder for testing and possible use as a supplement to, or substitute for, the Lingen powder."
(Application for NRC Export Licence XSOU-8833, March 24, 2014 , ADAMS Acc. No. ML14090A010)
On Aug. 22, 2014, NRC issued the requested export license for a total of 750 t of depleted uranium in the form of uranium dioxide powder (UO2), with an expiration date of Dec. 31, 2019.
> Download Export License XSOU-8833
On Dec. 23, 2014, NRC issued Amendment No. 1 to the export license.
On March 26, 2018, NRC terminated the license, since it is "no longer needed" as its "export has been completed", thus avoiding the necessity for another amendment that would have been required to reflect the name change from Areva Inc. to Framatome.
MELOX plant ships MOX fuel elements in uncertified container models
On Oct. 24, 2012, Areva notified ASN that fresh MOX fuel rods had been shipped from the MELOX fuel plant in Marcoule to the FBFC fuel plant in Dessel, Belgium, in uncertified container models.
The fuel rods were transported surrounded by straps used for handling. These straps, composed of hydrogen-containing material, were not supposed to be present in the container model used. When exposed to radiation, hydrogen-containing material may increase the internal pressure in the container, presenting the risk of an explosion, or the production of inflammable gas.
The event was rated level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Nov. 19, 2012)
Areva suspends capacity increase at MELOX MOX fuel plant
On Dec. 13, 2011, Areva announced the suspension of the capacity increase at the MELOX plant in Marcoule.
(AFP Dec. 13, 2011)
Contamination incident at MELOX MOX fuel plant
On June 28, 2011, a mechanical failure of an assembly bench caused a radioactive contamination event at the fuel assembly stage of the MELOX MOX fuel plant. Seventeen workers could return to their workplaces after medical checks. The event was rated level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN July 5, 2011)
MELOX SA new owner of MELOX MOX fuel plant
On Sep. 3, 2010, the Ministry of Ecology approved the ownership change of the MELOX Marcoule plant from Areva NC to MELOX SA, a 100% owned subsidiary of Areva NC.
(Journal Officiel Sep. 5, 2010)
Worker contaminated in glove box accident at MELOX fuel fabrication plant
On Feb. 9, 2010, a worker was contaminated when the glove box he was using was damaged in an accident. The worker was transfered to a specialized medical service in the Paris area. The event was rated level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Feb. 11, 2010)
MOX fuel lots mixed up at MELOX fuel fabrication plant
On Oct. 20, 2009, three baskets carrying MOX fuel pellets were mixed up at the Marcoule MOX plant. The error was not detected until Oct. 29, 2009. ASN rated the incident level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Nov. 6, 2009)
Violation of criticality rules at MELOX MOX fuel plant
On March 3, 2009, the amount of fissile material located in a working station exceeded the permissible limit by 1%. No criticality occured, as the limit is set at half the amount required to initiate a criticality. Areva had initially rated the event level 1 on the INES scale. In view of the violation of several safety requirements that led to the event, the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) changed the rating to level 2 on the INES scale.
(Areva March 4, 2009; ASN March 19, 2009)
Spill at Marcoule waste water treatment plant
On July 17, 2007, three cubic meters of waste water with a specific activity of approx. 40 Bq/cm3 spilled inside the building; only some dozen litres reached the outside of the building. The event was rated level 1 on the INES scale.
Violation of criticality rules at MELOX MOX fuel plant
On May 29, 2007, an automatic transport cart carrying plutonium oxide was permitted to enter an already loaded working station. No criticality occured. The incident was rated INES 1.
(ASN July 9, 2007)
Government authorizes further capacity increase for MELOX MOX fuel plant
On April 26, 2007, Areva received government approval for the requested capacity increase of the MELOX MOX fuel plant from 145 to 195 tHM/a. (Areva April 27, 2007)
Public Inquiry into further extension of MELOX MOX fuel plant
On Feb. 2, 2006, the Vice Minister of Industry announced the start of the public consultation process regarding the increase of capacity from 145 to 195 tHM/a. The public inquiry will be held from April 18 to June 17, 2006.
> View speech of François Loos, Vice Minister of Industry, Feb. 2, 2006 (in French)
MELOX MOX fuel fabrication plant requests further capacity increase
In September 2004, MELOX requested a further capacity increase from 145 to 195 tHM/a. (Areva)
ASN authorizes capacity increase for MELOX MOX fuel plant
On Sep. 3, 2003, the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) issued a decree authorizing a capacity increase from 101 to 145 tonnes for the MELOX MOX fuel plant at Marcoule. The increase compensates for the shutdown of the Cadarache MOX fuel plant. According to a COGEMA release of Sep. 4, 2003, the capacity increase is achieved without extension nor major modifications to the plant.
> View ASN release Sep. 4, 2003 (in French)
> View Décret n° 2003-843 (Journal Officiel Sep. 4, 2003) (in French)
Elevated radiation found near MELOX MOX fuel plant
The independent radiation monitoring organization CRIIRAD has found elevated gamma radiation on public roads and in vineyards outside the fence of the MELOX MOX fuel plant at Marcoule (Gard). The radiation exposure is twice background in some places. The radiation source is assumed to be waste stocked on site.
> Download CRIIRAD release Jan. 16, 2003 (179k PDF, in French)
On Jan. 14, 2003, Greenpeace France started a campaign of environmental monitoring around the Marcoule plant.
> View Greenpeace press release · campaign announcement (in French)
A public inquiry into the planned extension of the capacity of the MELOX mixed oxide (MOX) fuel plant in Marcoule will be initiated. The capacity increase is required to transfer the capacity of the Cadarache plant to Marcoule. The Cadarache plant is to be closed for its earthquake hazard.
> View ASN release Sep. 26, 2002 (in French)
The Ministries of the ecology and of the industry asked the prefect of Gard to open a public inquiry into the demand presented by COGEMA for the extension of the capacity of its MELOX factory of MOX fuel, located in Marcoule.
> View Ecol. Ministry release Oct. 23, 2002 (in French)
The public inquiry was set to begin on 8 January, 2003, in the two departements (counties) nearest the plant site at Marcoule. The prefect of the Gard departement that contains the Marcoule site announced the opening of the two-month inquiry on 3 December, 2002. (WNA News Briefing Jan. 15, 2003)
Marcoule events (ASN, in French)
(formerly Areva NP / FBFC Romans)
INB No. 98, 63
Information about FBFC plant (Nuclear Safety Authority - ASN, in French)
Fuel fabrication for MARVEL microreactor starts at Framatome's Romans plant
TRIGA International recently started fabricating fuel for the U.S. Department of Energy's MARVEL microreactor project.
The first shipment of fuel is expected to be delivered in spring 2025.
TRIGA International is a joint venture between Framatome and General Atomics and is the only TRIGA fuel supplier in the world.
The company was awarded an approximately $8.4 million contract in November to produce 37 TRIGA fuel elements for the MARVEL project and started the fabrication process at its facility in Romans, France late last month.
The fuel created for MARVEL is similar to the TRIGA fuel used in university reactors for research and hands-on training.
(U.S. DOE Feb. 7, 2024)
Enriched UF6 from Urenco Almelo arrives in unsecured overpack at Framatome Romans plant
The Framatome company, located in Romans-sur-Isère, declared a significant transport event to the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) on December 22, 2023.
Upon receipt at the Framatome Romans site of UX-30 packaging loaded with cylinders filled with uranium hexafluoride (UF6) from the Urenco plant in Almelo (Netherlands), it was noted by the teams responsible for controlling the receipt of packages, that five ball pins located on the same side of a UX-30 transport package were not engaged in their respective bore.
This event had no impact on personnel or the environment.
However, this ball pin system ensures the closure of the UX-30 package. Only correct engagement of the ball pins allows the upper shell of the packaging to be secured to its lower shell. The ball pins play a direct role in the robustness of the packaging.
A failure of this system therefore calls into question the safety functions that any type B transport package must ensure, in accordance with international regulations relating to the safety of the transport of radioactive substances. It is not guaranteed that a shell would remain attached to the package in the event of an accidental transport situation (fall, fire). [...]
ASN classifies this event as level 1 of the INES scale.
(ASN Jan. 30, 2024)
Public consultation on extended operation of old uranium zone at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
At the end of the review of the research fuel manufacturing facilities, ASN considered that the safety level of the "uranium zone" (ZU) did not allow continued operation in the long term and that the activities carried out had to be be transferred to a new building, called the "new uranium zone" (NZU). By decision 2019-DC-0670 of June 4, 2019, ASN regulated the continued operation of the "uranium zone" until the commissioning of the "new uranium zone", then envisaged before December 31, 2022.
However, the construction and commissioning of the "new uranium zone" fell significantly behind schedule, due in particular to the Covid-19 crisis, as well as technical difficulties encountered. Consequently, the operator requested ASN on May 20, 2022 to modify the requirement governing the operation of the "uranium zone".
ASN considers that the continued operation of the "uranium zone" beyond December 31, 2022 is acceptable in terms of safety and radiation protection provided that it is limited to what is strictly necessary, until the "new uranium zone" is fully operational, and that it is accompanied by a progressive reduction in the "source term" (quantity of nuclear material) currently present in the "uranium zone".
Furthermore, the same ASN decision of June 4, 2019 sets the maximum quantity of uranium present in the L1 laboratory. However, operating experience feedback from the L1 laboratory reveals that this limit is not appropriate and leads to operating difficulties likely to degrade the overall safety of the installation, for example an increase in the number of operations and transport of materials. Consequently, the operator asked ASN to raise the maximum limit of uranium present in the L1 laboratory.
ASN considers that adapting the quantity of uranium authorized in the L1 laboratory makes it possible to improve the operating conditions without calling into question, in normal or accidental operation, the sufficiency of the safety systems present.
Submit comments by November 7, 2023.
> View ASN notice, Oct. 24, 2023 (in French)
> Download: Décision no 2019-DC-0670 de l'Autorité de sûreté nucléaire du 4 juin 2019 , June 4, 2019 (148kB PDF - in French)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On the Framatome site in Romans-sur-Isère, the treatment of effluents and waste includes their collection, transport and packaging before sending to the National Agency for the Management of Radioactive Waste (ANDRA).
As part of this treatment, transfers of this waste are organized regularly on the site's internal traffic routes in containers whose mass in 235U is legally limited to 45g.
Three of these transfers have exceeded this regulatory limit since 2021. These exceedances have not called into question the level of security of these internal transports.
(Framatome Sep. 26, 2023)
Loose screws found at transport packages holding fuel assemblies shipped by Framatome's Romans-sur-Isère nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On December 21, 2022, Framatome declared a significant event to the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) relating to faulty tightening of one or two screws that are part of the closure system of FCC transport packages loaded with new fuel, detected when they were received in nuclear power plants.
The event concerns the transport of new fuel produced in the basic nuclear installation (INB) 63-U, located in the town of Romans-sur-Isère (Drôme).
An initial observation by the Gravelines nuclear power plant (NPP) of December 7, 2022 indicates that on an FFC package, one of the thirty closing screws was no longer tight when the package arrived at the NPP. Framatome then requested additional checks which led to the detection of five other packages of the same type, in Gravelines and Blayais, each of which had one or two loose screws on arrival.
Tightening deviations on arrival had already been identified in the past; in particular at the beginning of 2022, four packages gave rise to the same findings of non-compliant screw tightening. Framatome then reinforced the verification of the correct tightening of the screws on closing before shipment. At this stage, the reasons for these tightening deviations are not known.
This event had no consequences during the transport on the workers, the population and the environment. However, due to the repetitive nature of the non-conformities detected, the incident was rated level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Dec. 27, 2022)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On December 16, 2022, Framatome notified the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) of a significant event relating to criticality risk management.
On 13 December, the production coordinator detected in the rod repair area [of the pelleting workshop in INB 63-U] the presence of a fuel rod chute placed above other chutes. However, the criticality rules require this workshop to store the trunking in a single layer.
As soon as this anomaly was detected, the Framatome teams brought the storage into compliance with the installation's criticality rules.
Given the safety margins retained with respect to the risk of criticality, this event had no consequences for the workers or the environment.
Due to non-compliance with the installation's safety baseline relating to the prevention of the risk of criticality, the incident was classified as level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Dec. 20, 2022)
ASN hesitantly reduces generous release limits for radionuclides at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
In its Decision No 2022-DC-0741 of 8 September 2022, the Nuclear Safety Authority ASN modified the annual standards (set out in the decree of 22 June 2000) for gazeous and liquid effluents from the Romans-sur-Isère nuclear fuel plant, including the following reductions for release limits of radionuclides, still leaving a wide margin above the actual releases reported by Framatome for 2021:
Gazeous releases [MBq/a] | Standard | Actual release |
2000 | 2022 | 2021 |
all uranium isotopes | 200 | 80 | 0.01 |
transuranic elements | 10 | 3 | 0.003 |
fission products | 300 | 12 | 1.9 |
| |
Liquid effluents [MBq/a] | Standard | Actual release |
2000 | 2022 | 2021 |
all uranium isotopes | 7000 | 1500 | 70 |
transuranic elements | 100 | 3 | 0.02 |
fission products | 3000 | 200 | 4 |
|
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On September 21, in the pelleting workshop at Framatome's site in Romans-sur-Isère, during a recycling operation in a sealed enclosure, a bottle was filled beyond the weight limit given in the general operating rules. The operation was immediately stopped and the equipment brought back into compliance.
(Framatome Sep. 27, 2022)
[This incident occured on the same day as the fire reported below!]
Fire at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
A fire started by a printer this Wednesday (Sep. 21) in a workshop containing uranium at the Framatome plant in Romans-sur-Isère (Drôme) was "under control" and the first measurements carried out by the operator established that there was "no rise in radioactivity," the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) told AFP.
The event, due to a "printer that caught fire", lasted about an hour, according to ASN chief inspector Christophe Quintin. The outbreak of fire was brought under control by means internal to the company.
The fire was detected at 4:25 p.m., according to the prefecture, and the operator informed ASN at 5:10 p.m., according to the latter.
The printer caught fire in a place where nuclear materials were stored in "plexiglass boxes", said Christophe Quintin. This uranium was solid.
On site is also 1.7 kg of uranium in the form of recovered powder, but "far enough from the hearth", he added. The fire started in a room of 20 square meters, according to the prefecture.
The staff was evacuated, production in this building stopped and all the premises within the factory were made safe, according to the operator.
(Le Telegramme Sep. 21, 2022)
> See also: Inspection Report , ASN, Sep. 23, 2022 (263kB PDF - in French)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
In the pelleting workshop an operator discovered, when he took up his post on February 4, 2022, a bottle containing fissile material in a location not intended for this purpose.
(ASN Feb. 14, 2022)
Framatome and General Atomics reopen fuel manufacturing facility for TRIGA research reactors at Romans
Framatome and General Atomics recently celebrated the reopening of the fuel manufacturing facility dedicated to TRIGA research reactors. The renovations were done to support new requirements by the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE). The facility received the authorization to restart from the French regulator ASN and resumed operation on December 20.
Following an extensive renovation, this unique facility houses the latest industrial equipment and utilizes modernized processes to fabricate TRIGA fuel at Framatome CERCA in Romans-sur-Isère, France. This refurbishment project launched in 2018, with funding by the US DOE and TRIGA International's capital investments.
(Framatome Feb. 3, 2022)
On March 7, 2023, Framatome announced the completion of the first fabricated TRIGA metallic fuel element in over a decade.
In response to the U.S. Office of Nuclear Energy's goal to maintain world-class research and development capabilities, Framatome relaunched its dedicated TRIGA manufacturing facility at CERCA Romans, France. After completing the $80 million modernization project, operations resumed for the first time since 2012.
(Framatome Mar. 7, 2023)
Construction of storage facility for enriched reprocessing uranium at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
"Works in 2021: URE park (Enriched reprocessing uranium)
Development work will be initiated for the establishment of a new storage facility for cylinders containing URE.
This facility will make it possible, on the one hand, to store each cylinder inside concrete hulls, and, on the other hand, to set up handling devices that can be controlled remotely in order to meet the dosimetric challenges of the personnel."
(Framatome presentation at Assemblée générale de la Commission Locale d'Information, June 1, 2021)
[The storage facility will be located immediately at the southern site boundary.]
> See also here
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On September 21, 2021, Framatome declared to the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) a significant event relating to the control of the criticality risk at its Romans-sur-Isère plant.
The event took place in Basic Nuclear Installation (BNI) No. 63, dedicated to the manufacture of fuel elements for research reactors and irradiation targets for medical use. The nuclear material used in this facility is highly enriched uranium. The workshop in which the event occurred has an authorization to use material enriched to a maximum of 20% in uranium-235.
On September 13, the operator planned the dismantling of an old furnace because this equipment no longer met current safety standards. During these dismantling operations, uranium material was found in the furnace. However, after isotopic analysis, this material exhibits an enrichment slightly greater than the 20% authorized in this workshop.
The event was classified at level 1 on the INES scale
(ASN Sep. 22, 2021)
ASN invites comment on draft decision on effluents from Framatome's Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
The Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) has issued a draft decision on revised limits for liquid and gaseous effluents from Framatome's Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant.
Submit comments by August 29, 2021.
> View/Download ASN announcement and related documents , July 15, 2021 (in French)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On May 14, canisters holding liquid effluents with uranium enriched to more than 5% U-235 were stored in an area where only canisters holding less than 5% U-235 were allowed.
(Framatome May 28, 2021)
The Nuclear Safety Authority ASN classified the event level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN May 31, 2021)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On April 19, while a sieving operation was planned, several containers holding fine particles of recovered uranium-bearing material were transported together, in a cart not designed for this purpose. This constituted a deviation from the general operating rules relating to the prevention of criticality risk. As soon as this anomaly was detected, the containers were isolated. The situation detected does not call into question the safety margins.
(Framatome Apr. 20, 2021)
Because of the failure to comply with the facility's safety standards for criticality risk prevention, the incident was classified as level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Apr. 22, 2021)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On April 7, during a cleaning operation in a shutdown workshop at Effluent and Waste Treatment Unit, the presence of uranium-bearing materials not listed in the tracking system was detected. This discrepancy in accounting led to an excess of the authorized mass of uranium 235 in this workshop. As soon as it was detected, the drums containing these materials were transferred to a suitable storage area, allowing a return to a compliant situation. The exceeding of this limit did not call into question the safety margins.
(Framatome Apr. 13, 2021)
Because of the failure to comply with the facility's safety baseline relating to criticality risk prevention, the incident was classified at level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Apr. 14, 2021)
"Our client EDF has asked us to manufacture Uranium from reprocessing (URE) fuels from 2023 for a period of about 10 years: 2023: up to 150 t with U-232 at 15 ppb; 2025: up to 300 t with U-232 at 30 ppb"
"URE has different radiological characteristics than Natural Enriched Uranium.
The Romans site will therefore carry out actions to optimize radiation protection by implementing technical or organizational modifications in order to reduce the radiological impact of the URE.
Work will take place in the south of the site, including the evacuation of unmarked soil, in order to store the cylinders containing this URE."
(Framatome presentation at Assemblée générale de la Commission Locale d'Information, Nov. 19, 2020)
By 2022, a public inquiry will be organized by the Prefecture of Drôme with the municipalities located within a radius of about 5 km around the site.
(Framatome presentation at Assemblée générale de la Commission Locale d'Information, June 1, 2021)
> See also here
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On March 17, 2021, during a packaging operation, a batch of [highly enriched] fuel plates (for research reactors) was made slightly exceeding the material mass limit authorized in the general operating rules.
(Framatome Mar. 19, 2021)
Due to non-compliance with a safety rule relating to the prevention of criticality risk, the incident was classified at level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Mar. 23, 2021)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Jan. 13, 2021, due to an electric fault, excessive amounts of criticality-relevant additives were added to uranium powder in the pelletizing workshop at Framatome's FBFC Romans-sur-Isère nuclear fuel fabrication plant.
(Framatome Jan. 20, 2021)
Due to non-compliance with the installation safety benchmark relating to the prevention of criticality risk, the incident was classified at level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Jan. 22, 2021)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Nov. 27, 2020, it was detected that excessive amounts of criticality-relevant additives were added to uranium powder in the pelletizing workshop at Framatome's FBFC Romans-sur-Isère nuclear fuel fabrication plant.
(Framatome Dec. 1, 2020)
After carrying out an inspection of the respective workshop on Dec. 16, 2020, the Nuclear Safety Authority ASN requested Orano to improve the supervision of the tasks performed in the workshop.
(ASN Dec. 23, 2020)
Greenpeace holds protest at Framatome Romans-sur-Isère plant against nuclear fuel transport to EPR Flamanville reactor
On Sunday, October 25, around thirty Greenpeace activists gathered at around 6 p.m. in front of the Framatome site in Romans-sur-Isère.
They were protesting in the face of a uranium convoy which must leave the Roman site for the EPR reactor at Flamanville (Manche). The protectors of the environment pointed out the dangerousness, according to them, of the Normandy site and the risks caused by this convoy of nuclear materials.
(Le Dauphiné Libéré Oct. 25, 2020)
Public consultation on measures planned to reduce releases from Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
Submit comments by July 31, 2020.
> View: ASN notice July 1, 2020 (in French)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On June 19, 2020, during a cleaning operation of equipment in the pelletizing workshop, a "bottle" was filled beyond the mass limit given in the rules operating conditions of this workshop. This situation results from the incorrect repositioning of a valve after its repair.
The incident was classified at level 1 of the INES scale.
(ASN June 30, 2020)
Violation of criticality rules with highly enriched uranium at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
The event took place in the basic nuclear installation 63 dedicated to the fabrication of fuel elements for research reactors and of radiation targets for medical use. The nuclear material used in this facility is highly enriched uranium. This uranium is shaped into objects called "cores," which are then used to make fuel plates. The uranium-bearing material is stored in referenced lockers.
In order to prevent the risk of criticality, locking of the locker doors is required, in order to guarantee the location of uranium-bearing material in the cells of the storage lockers in the event of an earthquake.
On February 25, 2020, during a periodic sampling check for the correct closure of the storage lockers, it was detected that two lockers were not locked. As soon as this anomaly was detected, Framatome teams launched a campaign to check all the lockers, which revealed that another locker in another storage cell was not locked.
The Nuclear Safety Authority rated the event at INES level 1.
(ASN Mar. 2, 2020)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On July 16, 2019, during a maintenance operation at the level of the grinding machines, wet uranium material was recovered in a suitable bottle and stored on a site dedicated to the 50 liter filter cans. This location is not authorized for the storage of this type of can and material.
The Nuclear Safety Authority rated the event at INES level 1.
(ASN July 29, 2019)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
In mid-July, as part of an internal control, it was found that the uranium mass limit in a bin (in the research fuel fabrication facility) was exceeded.
This overrun constitutes a departure from the general operating rules with regard to the prevention of the criticality risk.
(Framatome July 24, 2019)
The Nuclear Safety Authority rated the event at INES level 1. (ASN July 29, 2019)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On July 12, 2019, an employee found the presence of a trolley of nuclear materials out of its dedicated location.
This event, which had no impact on staff or the environment, constitutes a departure from the general operating rules, relating to the prevention of criticality risk.
(Framatome July 19, 2019)
The Nuclear Safety Authority rated the event at INES level 1. (ASN July 29, 2019)
Violation of criticality rules at Framatome's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On March 7, 2019, the Framatome Romans teams identified the presence of uranium materials packaged and stored in vinyl bags at one of the old pellet grinding machines currently being dismantled. Vinyl bags used for packaging are not permitted for temporary storage.
As soon as the gap was discovered, the material was packaged in drums, in accordance with the safety standards.
This event had no impact on the staff or the environment. However, Framatome Romans considered that this event showed a non-compliance with the criticality rules and proposed to the Nuclear Safety Authority to classify it at level 1 of the international scale of nuclear events (INES).
(Framatome Mar. 12, 2019)
Unexpected accumulation of fuel pellet grindings detected at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On November 21, during the weekly cleaning operation of a grinding machine, operators detected an unusual accumulation of fissile materials. The accumulated amount was larger than assumed for the safety analysis performed to demonstrate the absence of a criticality hazard. Verifications conducted after the event showed that the geometry insured that no criticality could occur. The event was rated Level 1 on the INES scale.
(Framatome Dec. 3, 2018 / ASN Dec. 10, 2018)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Sep. 25, 2018, an excessive amount of fissionable material was found at a workshop of the research fuel fabrication facility of the nuclear fuel plant.
(Framatome Sep. 28, 2018)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Aug. 30, 2018, a cart carrying canisters with uranium material recovered from the fuel tablet workshop for reuse in the production process was found in an unauthorized place.
(Framatome Sep. 7, 2018)
ASN finds numerous violations regarding waste management at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Aug. 7, 2018, the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) conducted an unannounced inspection at the FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant.
"The inspection revealed that several regulatory requirements relating to waste management were not met. In particular, the operator must take measures to ensure that no waste packages are stored outside the waste storage areas that they have defined for this purpose in their study on waste management. He will also have to review its practices for posting waste collection points, bags of waste, waste packages being filled and waste packages formed, in order to comply with regulatory obligations for posting waste containers. The operator will also have to review his organization to ensure the traceability and characterization of all the waste it produces, in accordance with the provisions in force. He will also have to ensure that all nuclear waste containers that leave a Zone of Possible Nuclear Waste Production (ZPPDN) are subject to a formal radiological control for the absence of surface contamination. Finally, given the malfunctions noted for the creation of the new waste storage area (contaminated rubble bins), the operator must ensure that he creates or modifies waste storage areas in line with his facility modification process." (ASN Aug. 20, 2018) [emphasis added]
Framatome will be designing, fabricating and supplying EDF with fuel assemblies using enriched reprocessed uranium* (known as "ERU")over the period 2023 to 2032 (1).
These fuel assemblies, set to be manufactured at Framatome's plant in Romans-sur-Isère (Drôme, France), will be destined for a number of nuclear reactors - belonging to EDF's fleet in operation - authorized to use them.
* Uranium derived from the reprocessing of used fuel (RepU or RU) can, once enriched (then called ERU), be used again to manufacture fuel for nuclear power plants.
(1) Project subject to administrative and regulatory authorizations.
(Framatome May 23, 2018)
> See also here
Nuclear Safety Authority ASN lifts tightened oversight on Framatome Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On May 3, 2018, the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) announced that it has lifted the tightened oversight imposed in 2014 on Framatome's Romans-sur-Isère nuclear fuel fabrication plant in view of the improvements performed.
However, in a review of the four years of tightened oversight, as presented at the May 31, 2018, meeting of the CLI Framatome Romans, the Nuclear Safety Authority ASN stated concerning the management of the criticality hazard at the plant: "Results: Decrease in deviations from criticality rules. There remain gaps related to the design of old equipment (especially the R1 workshop for the recycling of manufacturing scrap)." [emphasis added]
> Download: CLI de Framatome - Bilan du contrôle du site en 2017 , ASN Division de Lyon, Valence - 31 mai 2018 (578kB PDF in French)
Partial flooding of Framatome's Romans-sur-Isère nuclear fuel fabrication plant due to pipe rupture
On 2 March 2018, Framatome reported to the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) a significant event relating to the partial flooding of the so-called recycling workshop, which is a building containing nuclear material and in which rejected products are reworked for re-use in the production line. This partial flood was caused by the rupture of a heating pipe.
The Basic Nuclear Installation (INB) No. 98 is dedicated to the manufacture of new fuel elements used in pressurized water reactors, such as those operated by EDF. In this facility, the nuclear material used is uranium with a maximum enrichment rate of 5%. The recycling workshop implements various processes, the common goal of which is to recover the uranium contained in certain by-products and rejects from the other workshops of the facility. This workshop must be kept in depression with respect to the external atmosphere to ensure the confinement of the nuclear material: this depression is ensured by means of a ventilation system.
On February 28, 2018, an operator accidentally discovered that the ventilation room in the recycling shop was flooded. After investigation, it turned out that the water came from the heating circuit of the building's general ventilation.
Water infiltrated into the building's control room, as well as into an electrical room under the room containing the ventilation system. These infiltrations of water have degraded an electrical cabinet and have resulted in the failure of systems providing various safety functions of the building, including ventilation and the leak detection system retention tanks that are used to recover any leaks chemicals used in the workshop.
As soon as this partial flood was detected, the Framatome teams stopped the flow and suspended the operation of the building, where the processes were put in the safety position. Ground water has been pumped and will be analyzed for further processing.
There was no water flow outside the building.
This event had no impact on workers or the environment.
On March 5, 2018, an inspection was conducted by ASN on this event. Following this inspection, ASN asked Framatome to reinforce its monitoring of the recycling building, to extend it to the hours at which operating personnel are absent (nights, weekends and public holidays).
Due to the failure of systems providing security functions in the building, the incident was rated Level 1 on the INES scale (International Nuclear Event Scale 0-7 in increasing order of severity).
(ASN Mar. 9, 2018)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On the occasion of the cleaning of a uranium oxide fuel pellet production line, the operator noted the abnormal plugging of a funnel intended for the recovery of fragments of nuclear material. The unplugging procedure of this funnel has not been formally prepared, it has led to the filling of a vinyl bag with an abnormal amount of nuclear material and the dispersion of a small amount of material on the ground.
The bag used did not respect the geometry to guarantee the absence of risk of criticality. It has, moreover, been filled with a quantity of material exceeding the limit allowed by the general rules of operation for the receptacles intended to receive this type of material.
After transferring the contents of the bag into two containers provided for this purpose, accompanied by the cleaning of the material on the ground, the production line was normally restarted.
Despite the non-compliance with the general operating rules, no criticality accident occurred.
In addition, during the intervention, the workers wore respirators for the respiratory tract. Finally, the material remained confined in the room.
This event therefore had no impact on workers or the environment.
The incident was rated Level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Dec. 28, 2017)
Urenco Almelo (Netherlands) sends enriched uranium hexafluoride in unsuitable cylinder to Areva Romans fuel manufacturing plant in France
> View here
Appeals Court sanctions violations of criticality rules at Areva's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On 15 May 2017, the Grenoble Court of Appeal, overturning the judgment of the Valencia Criminal Court, acknowledged that mistakes had been made in the management of the FBFC plant in September 2012. The former head of the site was ordered to pay 15,000 euros in damages and 9,000 euros in costs.
The Areva NP plant in Romans-sur-Isère, a subsidiary of Areva, known until the end of 2014 under the name of FBFC, manufactures nuclear fuel rods used in reactors. For several years, serious negligence has been repeated, causing the workers and residents of the factory to run a real risk.
For example, in September 2012, inspections showed that the plant, in defiance of the most basic safety rules, sometimes stored "bottles" containing dry and wet fissile materials. However, the latter must be subject to additional precautions because they are more likely to trigger an uncontrolled chain reaction.
In 2014, the "Sortir du Nucléaire" network had summoned Areva and the successive directors of the site before the Criminal Court of Valencia to answer for the offenses committed.
Since the Tribunal had decided in April 2016 to release them, the associations had appealed against that decision. The appeal hearing took place on 7 November 2016. On 15 May 2017, the Grenoble Court of Appeal finally sanctioned the disastrous management of the plant.
(Sortir du Nucléaire May 16, 2017)
> See also: Violation of criticality rules at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant (Sep. 26, 2012)
Violation of radiation protection rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On 8 February, a radiation protection technician detected a gap in the monitoring of the ambient air at a construction site.
(Areva Feb. 24, 2017)
Air contamination monitoring was missing for several weeks between end November 2016 and early February 2017.
The Nuclear Safety Authority ASN rated this event Level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Mar. 1, 2017)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Aug. 18, 2016, Areva noticed the transfer of an excessive number of fuel element components in the research reactor fuel workshop.
Areva proposes to rate the event Level 1 of the INES scale.
(Areva Aug. 23, 2016)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Apr. 18, 2016, Areva announced that during a weekly cleaning operation of some equipment in a workshop recovering uranium material for reuse, an operator found an exceedance of the uranium mass allowed in the receptacle provided for this purpose. Areva proposes to rate the event Level 1 of the INES scale.
ASN assesses waste management at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant 'not satisfactory'
On Mar. 9, 2016, the Nuclear Safety Authority held an unannounced inspection at the FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant.
"The results of this inspection are not satisfactory. The visit to the laboratory highlighted a good maintenance of facilities and waste collection points but raised gaps in the control of risk of contamination transfer at the interfaces between nuclear waste zones and those with conventional waste. In addition, the inspectors witnessed the orientation of a bag of waste towards the wrong disposal process; however, this discrepancy was immediately corrected. Visiting other installations revealed some more minor deviations.[...]" (ASN Mar. 25, 2016) [emphasis added]
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Sep. 24, 2015, Areva announced that excessive residual waste was found at the bottom of a waste water collection sump at the waste-treatment facility of the plant. Areva proposes to rate the event Level 1 of the INES scale.
Nuclear Safety Authority ASN keeps Areva's FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant under tightened oversight
"ASN has conducted, from 24 to 28 November 2014, a review inspection of AREVA's nuclear fuel manufacturing plant FBFC in Romans-sur-Isère to review the safety management and the operating rigor on the site. [...]"
"The objective of this inspection was to verify AREVA's implementation of improvement actions on the site in terms of safety management and operational rigor. Indeed, the ASN had placed the site of AREVA FBFC under enhanced vigilance at the end of 2013 and convened the Directorate General of AREVA in February 2014 asking it to improve the safety of the site. Following this hearing, the licensee sent ASN a safety improvement plan outlining the commitments, bearing both on improving the operational rigor and on strengthening security some structures and equipment on the site, over several years. [...]"
"On completion of this review inspection, ASN observed that the first actions to improve the plant's organization of safety-related issues are being deployed within the facilities, while other actions for improvement are still awaited. [...]"
"In conclusion, the operator must continue its efforts to improve the safety of site facilities. ASN therefore maintained its heightened vigilance on the implementation of planned actions and expects the effective improvement of operational rigor. [...]"
(ASN June 23, 2015 - emphasis added)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Dec. 2, 2014, Areva announced that four canisters containing scrap uranium oxide pellets were stored outside their dedicated slot on the ground.
The company proposed to rate the event Level 1 on the INES scale.
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Oct. 2, 2014, Areva notified the Nuclear Safety Authority ASN of a significant event involving the violation of the storage rules for uranium at the FBFC Romans nuclear fuel plant.
The Nuclear Safety Authority ASN rated this event Level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Oct. 15, 2014)
Inspection on criticality safety brings "unacceptable" practices to light at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel plant
Alerted by a series of violations of criticality rules at the FBFC Romans nuclear fuel plant, the Nuclear Safety Authority ASN conducted an inspection on criticality safety procedures at the plant. The inspection identified a number of problems, in particular the following ones that were considered "unacceptable" by the authority:
- new workers received their first training on radiological protection and the hazards of criticality only one year after starting work,
- the measurements to prevent citicality by accumulating uranium dust in air filters were performed in a negligent way, making them useless: the uranium dust mass in the filters is determined by occasionally measuring the drop in pressure across the filter. When checking the measurement records, ASN found that in some instances the pressure drop across a filter decreased rather than increased with the time in service. It turned out that the manometer in use overestimated the pressure by 8 mm WC (water column), and, when the measurements were performed by an operator other than the regular one, the readings wer not corrected appropriately.
> Download: ASN letter to FBFC Romans fuel plant , Oct. 3, 2014 (147k PDF - in French)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
During a stock-taking in the aftermath of the Sep. 22, 2014, incident, Areva found on Sep. 30, 2014, that during the production process nuclear fuel components were stored at locations not intended for this purpose.
The Nuclear Safety Authority ASN rated this event Level 1 on the INES scale.
(ASN Oct. 2, 2014)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Sep. 22, 2014, Areva announced that a lot of unfinished fuel plates (made of highly enriched uranium) for research reactors was stored in shelves not suitable for plates of this dimension.
The company proposed to rate the event Level 1 on the INES scale.
The Nuclear Safety Authority ASN confirmed this rating on Sep. 26, 2014.
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Sep. 2, 2014, Areva announced that the density of uranium in a research reactor fuel workshop slightly exceeded the level assumed in the safety studies. No criticality occured, as there still was a safety margin of a factor of four.
The company proposed to rate the event Level 1 on the INES scale.
The Nuclear Safety Authority ASN confirmed this rating on Sep. 10, 2014.
Event at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On June 16, 2014, Areva announced that a humidity sensor set off an alarm in the uranium pellet fabrication workshop of its Romans-sur-Isère nuclear fuel plant. First investigations showed that the concentration of some (unidentified) chemical element in reject uranium powder slightly exceeded the authorized limit. Areva proposed to rate this event Level 1 on the INES scale.
Container holding enriched uranium powder accidentally cut up at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Apr. 23, 2014, a container supposed to be empty was cut up, while it still contained uranium powder enriched up to 5%.
A similar incident had occured in 2009 already.
The event was rated Level 1 of the INES scale.
(ASN Apr. 29, 2014)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
Two lots of fuel slabs for research reactors were placed on a workbench, where only one was allowed.
The company proposes to rate the event Level 1 on the INES scale.
(Areva Feb. 27, 2014)
Truck with low-level waste from FBFC nuclear fuel plant in accident
On 26 Nov. 2013, a truck carrying two containers with low-level radioactive waste originating from the FBFC Romans nuclear fuel plant had an accident on an icy road near Arsonval, approx. 30 km from Morvilliers (Aube). The containers were not damaged in the accident.
(Areva Nov. 26, 2013)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Sep. 19, 2013, Areva declared an event concerning the unplanned accumulation of uranium dust in the ventilation system of the plant.
The event was rated Level 1 of the INES scale.
(ASN Sep. 20, 2013)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
During the preparation for the manufacturing of fuel for a research reactor, the permissible amount of fuel was exceeded at a workplace.
The company proposes to rate the event Level 1 on the INES scale.
(Areva Feb. 6, 2013)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Dec. 19, 2012, a vacuum cleaner used in a workshop for the production of uranium pellets at the FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant was found to have accumulated an excessive amount of dust.
Areva proposes to rate the event Level 1 on the INES scale.
(Areva Dec. 20, 2012)
On Sep. 26, 2012, the FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant declared a significant event, when wet material was transported inside the plant under the less stringent conditions applicable only for dry material - constituting a criticality hazard.
The event was rated Level 1 of the INES scale.
(ASN Sep. 27, 2012)
On Oct. 30, 2012, ASN re-rated the event Level 2 of the INES scale, after it turned out that the violation was no exception.
(ASN Oct. 31, 2012)
Violation of criticality rules at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On April 10, 2012, the FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant declared a significant event, when the permissible amount of enriched UO2F2 powder was exceeded in a vacuum cleaner - presenting a criticality hazard.
The event was rated Level 1 of the INES scale.
(ASN April 12, 2012)
ASN finds radiation protection at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant 'not satisfactory'
On Apr. 19, 2012, the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) held an inspection of the FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant.
"The conclusions of this inspection are not satisfactory. The inspectors found breaches of several regulatory requirements relating to radiation protection in the areas mentioned previously. This inspection also revealed weaknesses in the assessment and for optimizing exposure to ionizing radiation. Improvements are in particular to provide in the application of the principle of optimization, the monitoring of training, the establishment for each worker with an exposure sheet and monitoring of external technical controls. Inspectors nevertheless appreciated the actions taken by the operational radiation protection service to improve daily radiological cleanliness of the premises." (ASN May 11, 2012) [emphasis added]
Uranium-containing slurries detected in rainwater collection system of FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Nov. 12, 2009, Areva notified the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) of the detection of uranium-containing slurries in the rainwater collection system of its FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant in Romans-sur-Isère. The origin of the slurries predates the separation of the rainwater collection system from the process waste water systems at the plant. The uranium concentrations found do not present a criticality hazard. There was no impact on workers nor the environment outside the plant.
The incident was rated INES 1.
(ASN Nov. 17, 2009)
Leak detected in sewage system of FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On July 17, 2008, Areva notified the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) of a break of an underground sewage system for uranium-containing liquids at its FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant in Romans-sur-Isère. An inspection held by ASN the same night reveiled that the rupture had occured years ago (!). Areva is currently busy cleaning up the contaminated area. ASN provisionally rated the event INES 1.
(ASN July 18, 2008)
> Download detailed report about the incident by independent laboratory CRIIRAD: Commentaires sur lincident du 17 juillet 2008: détection dune fuite sur une canalisation à lusine FBFC-CERCA (AREVA) de Romans-sur-Isère, Note CRIIRAD N°08-149 (July 21, 2008, PDF - in French)
FBFC Romans nuclear fuel fabrication plant applies for capacity increase
FBFC - Framatome ANP's fuel subsidiary - has applied for a licence to expand capacity at its Romans fabrication plant. The company's current licence for the Romans plant limits it to 1200 tU in conversion (UF6 to UO2) and 820 tU in pelletizing and assembly. The licence application submitted would increase those limits to 1800 tU for conversion and 1400 tU for pelletizing and finishing operations. FBFC is modernizing the plant to meet new safety and radiation protection standards, partly through the use of more automated processes. (WNA News Briefing 04.05, Feb. 4, 2004)
Incidents at FBFC nuclear fuel fabrication plant
On Oct. 27, 2009, a small spill of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) occured at a conversion kiln.
(ASN Nov. 2, 2009)
On June 3, 2008, the rules to prevent criticality were violated in the pelletizing workshop. Scrap UO2 material was held in waste containers exceeding the safe mass limit. The event was classified INES 1. (ASN June 20, 2008)
On Nov. 16, 2007, ENUSA (Spain) detected traces of leaked UO2 powder at some containers received from FBFC Romans. The event was classified INES 1.
On May 17, 2004, the rules to prevent criticality were violated: in the conversion plant, the UF6 feed was not interrupted, although the monitoring equipment for the humidity contained in the UO2 powder product was not functioning. However, no criticality occured. The event was classified INES 1.
On July 22, 2003, the rules to prevent criticality were violated: twice the licensed amount of uranium-235 was stored in a cask. No criticality occured. The event was classified INES 1.
On Feb. 21, 2003, the rules to prevent criticality were violated: a cask containing 41 kilograms of enriched uranium powder was stored in an area where only 27 kilograms were permitted. However, no criticality occured. The event was classified INES 1.
INB No. 32, 54
Information about Cadarache plant (Nuclear Safety Authority - ASN, in French)
Commission Locale d'Information de Cadarache
> View more recent issues
Violation of criticality rules at Cadarache MOX fuel fabrication plant
On April 15, 2011, the Commissariat à lénergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA) announced that 24 bins at the Atelier de technologie plutonium (ATPu) and Laboratoire de purification chimique (LPC) workshops were found to exceeded the 100 g standard for fissile materials. The event was rated level 1 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES).
(ASN May 24, 2011)
Violation of criticality rules at Cadarache MOX fuel fabrication plant
On Dec. 21, 2010, elevated amounts of fissile material were detected in four waste bins in the "l'Atelier de Technologie du Plutonium" (ATPu). The amounts were above the licensed limit, but far below the criticality level.
(Areva Dec. 30, 2010)
Violation of criticality rules at Cadarache MOX fuel fabrication plant
On Oct. 26, 2010, 246 g of fissile material were found in a waste drum that was licensed to hold only 100 g. Two other drums were identified, where this limit possibly was exceeded. The event had no impacts on workers nor environment. The event was rated level 1 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES).
(ASN Nov. 9, 2010)
Surplus enriched uranium found at Cadarache MOX fuel fabrication plant
After the find of undeclared plutonium at Cadarache (see below), there now has been found excess enriched uranium, as well: 10 kg of low enriched uranium were found at a storage where only 4 kg were permitted.
(AFP Oct. 25, 2009)
ASN suspends dismantling work at Cadarache MOX fuel fabrication plant for undeclared criticality hazard
The French nuclear safety watchdog ASN has suspended work dismantling a plutonium technology plant over worker safety fears, after almost three times as much plutonium was found at the site than expected.
The watchdog said it was only told of the problem on Oct. 6, although the Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), the state body that supervises the plant in Cadarache near the southern port of Marseille, had been aware of the problem since early June.
Around eight kilograms of plutonium were believed to have been stored at the site when it was in operation, but some 22 kilograms had been discovered to date and the final figure could be closer to 39 kilograms, the nuclear safety watchdog ASN said.
The underestimation of the quantity of plutonium sharply reduced safety margins designed to prevent fissile material reaching critical mass, "which could potentially have serious consequences for the workforce," the ASN statement said.
The watchdog ranked the event as a level two "incident" on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), which runs from zero to a maximum of seven for a major incident.
(Reuters Oct. 15, 2009)
> Download Avis de lIRSN sur lévénement significatif déclaré le 6 octobre 2009 concernant lAtelier de technologie du plutonium du centre de Cadarache (ATPu-INB 32) (Oct. 14, 2009) (96k PDF - in French)
On Nov. 3, 2009, ASN authorized the resumption of the dismantling work.
(ASN Nov. 3, 2009)
CRIIRAD presents study on environmental impact of Cadarache nuclear site
On June 23, 2009, the independent radiation laboratory CRIIRAD presented a study on the environmental impact of the nuclear center of Cadarache. Among others, the site comprises 19 Installations Nucléaire de Base (INB), including the closed MOX fuel plant. CRIIRAD had access to all site-specific documentation, but was not allowed to take independent measurements on site.
> View CRIIRAD documents June 23, 2009 (in French)
ASN orders CEA to clear former Cadarache MOX fuel plant of all nuclear material by end June 2008
> Download: Décision n° 2007-DC-0036 de lAutorité de sûreté nucléaire du 21 mars 2007 (PDF - in French)
ASN upgrades Cadarache MOX fuel plant incident to level 2 on INES scale
The French Nuclear Safety Authority (Autorité de sûreté nucléaire - ASN) has upgraded an incident that occured on November 6, 2006, at Areva's Cadarache MOX fuel plant (Atelier de Technologie du Plutonium - ATPu) to level 2 on the INES scale. A mill used for grinding of MOX fuel rejects (consisting of oxides of depleted uranium and plutonium) had inadvertently been loaded twice, exceeding the criticality criterion for the mill, but fortunately no criticality event was set off.
(ASN Jan. 9, 2007)
Fabrication of MOX fuel lead test assemblies for the U.S. DOE plutonium disposition program
On Aug. 12, 2003, Cogema has won the contract to fabricate the mixed-oxide (MOX) lead test assemblies (LTAs) for the US plutonium disposition programme. (WNA News Briefing 03.35, Sep. 3, 2003)
> See also: WISE Paris release Sep. 9, 2003 : "Transfer" of MOX production capacity from Cadarache to Marcoule: one scandal after another
On Oct. 6, 2003, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) applied for an export license (XSNM03327) to export up to 140 kg of plutonium oxide to France for the production of four MOX fuel "lead assemblies". The material will be shipped in July/August 2004 by sea transport from Charleston Naval Weapons Station , South Carolina, to Cherbourg, France. For sea transport, two armed Pacific Nuclear Transport, Ltd. (PNTL) ships sailing in convoy will be used. The fabricated MOX fuel assemblies will be returned the same way.
> See also: Federal Register: October 27, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 207)p. 61238 (download full text )
On June 15, 2004, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission denied petitions to intervene filed by Greenpeace International, Charleston Peace, and Blue
Ridge Environmental Defense League and directed the Office of International Programs to issue the export license. (SRM-M040615)
On June 16, 2004, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued the requested license for the plutonium export to France (XSNM03327).
On November 7, 2003, the U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) amended its January 11, 2000 Record of Decision (ROD) to allow for the fabrication of mixed oxide (MOX) fuel lead assemblies in France on a one-time basis.
> See: Federal Register: November 14, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 220) p. 64611-64614 (download full text )
On September 20, 2004, the Pacific Teal and the Pacific Pintail, two UK-registered ships dedicated to the transport of nuclear materials, left Charleston (South Carolina) carrying the plutonium for the MOX fuel lead assemblies to France. (Cogema Sep. 21, 2004)
Cadarache MOX fuel factory closed; concerns about possible future use for U.S. plutonium disposition program
The Cadarache MOX fuel factory ceased commercial production on July 31, 2003, due to the high seismic hazard at the site. The capacity of the MELOX plant at Marcoule will be increased to compensate for the closure.
> View ASN release Sep. 3, 2003 (in French)
However, according to a WISE-Paris Briefing, there is a possibility that the plant could be used for future production of MOX Lead Test Assemblies for the U.S. plutonium disposition program.
> View WISE-Paris release (July 30, 2003)
> Download WISE-Paris Briefing: U.S. "MOX Lead Test Assembly" Controversy: Fabrication at Cadarache, France (July 29, 2003) (325k PDF)
Cadarache factory will close in late 2002 or early 2003
The Cadarache mox fuel factory, which has been instructed to cease its activity because it does not comply with seismic safety regulations, is expected to close at the end of 2002 or early in 2003, according to the French nuclear safety agency ASN. In case owner Areva does not take the initiative in closing the site down, ASN will carry out the closure with the issue of a decree.
(La Tribune- France, Mar 21, 2002)
Cadarache Special of Plutonium Investigation newsletter
The April-May 2001 issue of WISE-Paris' newsletter Plutonium Investigation is a Cadarache Special:
> View/download Plutonium Investigation No.20
COGEMA confirms plans for closure of Cadarache MOX fuel plant
March 27, 2001: Cogéma confirms that it will close its Cadarache MOX fuel plant in a few years for the earthquake hazard at the plant site. The production of 40 t of MOX fuel is to be relocated to Cogéma's Marcoule plant. The closure might become effective in 2003. (AP March 27, 2001)
DSIN inspectors demand shutdown of Cadarache MOX fuel plant for earthquake hazard
July 19, 2000: After five years of fruitless pressure Cogema's L'Atelier de technologie du plutonium (ATPu) plant at Cadarache, which produces 40 tonnes of mixed oxide fuel (MOX) per year for export to Germany, government inspectors took the unprecedented step of releasing documents to WISE-Paris .
A 1994 survey showed that the area round Cadarache, near the mouth of the river Rhône, had experienced a "significant growth" of seismic activity since the end of 1993, and that "destructive" earthquakes could be expected to recur once a century.
The Directorate for the Safety of Nuclear Installations (Direction de la sûreté des installations nucléaires - DSIN ) held a meeting with the plant's operators Cogema in 1995, in which it said that "a rapid closure of the installation is necessary." It asked for a "plan for the future of the factory including a definitive closure date not long after 2000". (AFP, The Guardian, WISE-Paris)
> Download WISE-Paris briefing on Cadarache as PDF file (84k PDF in French)
> Download Briefing annexes (letters, map, figures) (848k PDF in French)
Cadarache events (ASN, in French)
INB No. 65, 90
Information about SICN plant (Nuclear Safety Authority - ASN, in French)
The plant halted all production at the end of 2002.
> View more recent issues
COGEMA/SICN nuclear fuel plant license jeopardized by poor safety culture
"From site surveillance visits of inspectors of the Nuclear Safety Authority, the generally low level in the matter of safety culture is known. The licensee has been informed that, if this situation became permanent, it would jeopardize the handling of any nuclear material exceeding the regulatory level of a Basic Nuclear Installation (INB)." (translated from ASN homepage, as of July 22, 2000)
Incidents at COGEMA/SICN nuclear fuel plant
SICN fuel plant events (ASN - in French)